Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishment of self-reported hearing cut-off value on the Chinese version of short form of speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12).
Meng, Linghui; Hao, Dingqian; Li, Dan; Yue, Jing; Wan, Yuzhu; Shi, Li.
Afiliação
  • Meng L; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Hao D; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
  • Li D; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Yue J; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bengbu First People's Hospital, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
  • Wan Y; Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Shi L; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Int J Audiol ; : 1-8, 2024 Mar 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478970
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Chinese version of Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (C-SSQ12) in the Chinese Mandarin-speaking population and to determine its screening cut-off value by comparing measured pure-tone average (PTA), the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) scores and C-SSQ12 scores.

DESIGN:

All participants completed the C-SSQ12 questionnaire and underwent the pure-tone audiometry. Older subjects aged ≧ 60 years completed the HHIE-S questionnaire. The optimal cut-off value for the C-SSQ12 as a hearing screening tool was calculated by comparing different cut-offs and hearing thresholds. STUDY SAMPLE A total of 300 subjects were recruited.

RESULTS:

There was a negative correlation between C-SSQ12 scores and HHIE-S scores (r = -0.749). C-SSQ12 scores were negatively correlated with PTA (r = -0.507; r = -0.542). The best cut-off value for the C-SSQ12 was 6.0, with a sensitivity of 78.2%, specificity of 80.3%, positive predictive value of 63.7% and negative predictive value of 97.0% (PTA > 40dBHL for bilateral ears).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to mild hearing loss, the C-SSQ12 is a reliable and validated hearing screening tool with increased sensitivity for detecting moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article