DAX-Net: A dual-branch dual-task adaptive cross-weight feature fusion network for robust multi-class cancer classification in pathology images.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Multi-class cancer classification has been extensively studied in digital and computational pathology due to its importance in clinical decision-making. Numerous computational tools have been proposed for various types of cancer classification. Many of them are built based on convolutional neural networks. Recently, Transformer-style networks have shown to be effective for cancer classification. Herein, we present a hybrid design that leverages both convolutional neural networks and transformer architecture to obtain superior performance in cancer classification. METHODS: We propose a dual-branch dual-task adaptive cross-weight feature fusion network, called DAX-Net, which exploits heterogeneous feature representations from the convolutional neural network and Transformer network, adaptively combines them to boost their representation power, and conducts cancer classification as categorical classification and ordinal classification. For an efficient and effective optimization of the proposed model, we introduce two loss functions that are tailored to the two classification tasks. RESULTS: To evaluate the proposed method, we employed colorectal and prostate cancer datasets, of which each contains both in-domain and out-of-domain test sets. For colorectal cancer, the proposed method obtained an accuracy of 88.4%, a quadratic kappa score of 0.945, and an F1 score of 0.831 for the in-domain test set, and 84.4%, 0.910, and 0.768 for the out-of-domain test set. For prostate cancer, it achieved an accuracy of 71.6%, a kappa score of 0.635, and an F1 score of 0.655 for the in-domain test set, 79.2% accuracy, 0.721 kappa score, and 0.686 F1 score for the first out-of-domain test set, and 58.1% accuracy, 0.564 kappa score, and 0.493 F1 score for the second out-of-domain test set. It is worth noting that the performance of the proposed method outperformed other competitors by significant margins, in particular, with respect to the out-of-domain test sets. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is not only accurate but also robust to varying conditions of the test sets in comparison to several, related methods. These results suggest that the proposed method can facilitate automated cancer classification in various clinical settings.