Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experiences with telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions: the views of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Sten-Gahmberg, Susanna; Pedersen, Kine; Harsheim, Ingrid Gaarder; Løyland, Hanna Isabel; Abelsen, Birgit.
Afiliação
  • Sten-Gahmberg S; Oslo Economics, Klingenberggata 7, Oslo, 0161, Norway. susanna.sten-gahmberg@etk.fi.
  • Pedersen K; The Finnish Centre for Pensions, Eläketurvakeskus, FI-00065, Finland. susanna.sten-gahmberg@etk.fi.
  • Harsheim IG; Oslo Economics, Klingenberggata 7, Oslo, 0161, Norway.
  • Løyland HI; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Postboks 1089, Blindern, Oslo, 0317, Norway.
  • Abelsen B; Oslo Economics, Klingenberggata 7, Oslo, 0161, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 341, 2024 Mar 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486179
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Telemedicine is often promoted as a possible solution to some of the challenges healthcare systems in many countries face, and an increasing number of studies evaluate the clinical effects. So far, the studies show varying results. Less attention has been paid to systemic factors, such as the context, implementation, and mechanisms of these interventions.

METHODS:

This study evaluates the experiences of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions with usual care. Patients in the intervention group received an individual treatment plan together with computer tablets and home telemonitoring devices to report point-of-care measurements, e.g., blood pressure, blood glucose or oxygen saturation, and to respond to health related questions reported to a follow-up service. In response to abnormal measurement results, a follow-up service nurse would contact the patient and consider relevant actions. We conducted 49 interviews with patients and 77 interviews with health personnel and managers at the local centers. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis and based on recommendations for conducting process evaluation, considering three core aspects within the process of delivering a complex intervention (1) context, (2) implementation, and (3) mechanisms of impact.

RESULTS:

Patients were mainly satisfied with the telemedicine-based service, and experienced increased safety and understanding of their symptoms and illness. Implementation of the service does, however, require dedicated resources over time. Slow adjustment of other healthcare providers may have contributed to the absence of reductions in the use of specialized healthcare and general practitioner (GP) services. An evident advantage of the service is its flexibility, yet this may also challenge cost-efficiency of the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

The implementation of a telemedicine-based service in primary healthcare is a complex process that is sensitive to contextual factors and that requires time and dedicated resources to ensure successful implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered in www. CLINICALTRIALS gov (NCT04142710). Study start 2019-02-09, Study completion 2021-06-30, Study type Interventional, Intervention/treatment Telemedicine tablet and tools to perform measurements. Informed and documented consent was obtained from all subjects and next of kin participating in the study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Clínicos Gerais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Clínicos Gerais Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article