Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neurophysiological outcomes that sustained clinically significant improvements over 3 years of physiologic ECAP-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain.
Mekhail, Nagy A; Levy, Robert M; Deer, Timothy R; Kapural, Leonardo; Li, Sean; Amirdelfan, Kasra; Hunter, Corey W; Rosen, Steven M; Costandi, Shrif J; Falowski, Steven M; Burgher, Abram H; Pope, Jason E; Gilmore, Christopher A; Qureshi, Farooq A; Staats, Peter S; Scowcroft, James; McJunkin, Tory; Kim, Christopher K; Yang, Michael I; Stauss, Thomas; Rauck, Richard; Duarte, Rui V; Soliday, Nicole; Leitner, Angela; Hanson, Erin; Ouyang, Zhonghua; Mugan, Dave; Poree, Lawrence.
Afiliação
  • Mekhail NA; Evidence-Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA mekhain@ccf.org.
  • Levy RM; Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  • Deer TR; Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
  • Kapural L; Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Li S; National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA.
  • Amirdelfan K; Integrated Pain Management Medical Group Inc, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
  • Hunter CW; Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, New York, USA.
  • Rosen SM; Delaware Valley Pain and Spine Institute, Trevose, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Costandi SJ; Evidence-Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Falowski SM; Argires-Marotti Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Burgher AH; HOPE Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Pope JE; Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, California, USA.
  • Gilmore CA; Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Qureshi FA; St Luke's Spine & Pain Associates, Easton, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Staats PS; National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA.
  • Scowcroft J; Pain Management Associates, Independence, Missouri, USA.
  • McJunkin T; Arizona Pain, Glendale, Arizona, USA.
  • Kim CK; Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
  • Yang MI; Summit Pain Alliance, Santa Rosa, California, USA.
  • Stauss T; Pain Physicians of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Rauck R; Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Duarte RV; Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Soliday N; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Leitner A; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Hanson E; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ouyang Z; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Mugan D; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Poree L; Saluda Medical Pty Ltd, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2024 Mar 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490687
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A novel, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system with a physiologic closed-loop (CL) feedback mechanism controlled by evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) enables the optimization of physiologic neural dose and the accuracy of the stimulation, not possible with any other commercially available SCS systems. The report of objective spinal cord measurements is essential to increase the transparency and reproducibility of SCS therapy. Here, we report a cohort of the EVOKE double-blind randomized controlled trial treated with CL-SCS for 36 months to evaluate the ECAP dose and accuracy that sustained the durability of clinical improvements.

METHODS:

41 patients randomized to CL-SCS remained in their treatment allocation and were followed up through 36 months. Objective neurophysiological data, including measures of spinal cord activation, were analyzed. Pain relief was assessed by determining the proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥80% reduction in overall back and leg pain.

RESULTS:

The performance of the feedback loop resulted in high-dose accuracy by keeping the elicited ECAP within 4µV of the target ECAP set on the system across all timepoints. Percent time stimulating above the ECAP threshold was >98%, and the ECAP dose was ≥19.3µV. Most patients obtained ≥50% reduction (83%) and ≥80% reduction (59%) in overall back and leg pain with a sustained response observed in the rates between 3-month and 36-month follow-up (p=0.083 and p=0.405, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

The results suggest that a physiological adherence to supra-ECAP threshold therapy that generates pain inhibition provided by ECAP-controlled CL-SCS leads to durable improvements in pain intensity with no evidence of loss of therapeutic effect through 36-month follow-up.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article