Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative epidemiology of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HOBSIs) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) across a three-hospital health system.
Krishnan, Jay; Gettler, Erin B; Campbell, Melissa; Kalu, Ibukunoluwa C; Seidelman, Jessica; Smith, Becky; Lewis, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Krishnan J; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gettler EB; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Campbell M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Kalu IC; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Seidelman J; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Smith B; Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lewis S; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-7, 2024 Mar 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505940
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the comparative epidemiology of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HOBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). DESIGN AND

SETTING:

Retrospective observational study of HOBSI and CLABSI across a three-hospital healthcare system from 01/01/2017 to 12/31/2021.

METHODS:

HOBSIs were identified as any non-commensal positive blood culture event on or after hospital day 3. CLABSIs were identified based on National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria. We performed a time-series analysis to assess comparative temporal trends among HOBSI and CLABSI incidence. Using univariable and multivariable regression analyses, we compared demographics, risk factors, and outcomes between non-CLABSI HOBSI and CLABSI, as HOBSI and CLABSI are not exclusive entities.

RESULTS:

HOBSI incidence increased over the study period (IRR 1.006 HOBSI/1,000 patient days; 95% CI 1.001-1.012; P = .03), while no change in CLABSI incidence was observed (IRR .997 CLABSIs/1,000 central line days, 95% CI .992-1.002, P = .22). Differing demographic, microbiologic, and risk factor profiles were observed between CLABSIs and non-CLABSI HOBSIs. Multivariable analysis found lower odds of mortality among patients with CLABSIs when adjusted for covariates that approximate severity of illness (OR .27; 95% CI .11-.64; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

HOBSI incidence increased over the study period without a concurrent increase in CLABSI in our study population. Furthermore, risk factor and outcome profiles varied between CLABSI and non-CLABSI HOBSI, which suggest that these metrics differ in important ways worth considering if HOBSI is adopted as a quality metric.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article