Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A blueprint for patient and public involvement in the development of a reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.
Elsman, Ellen B M; Smith, Maureen; Hofstetter, Catherine; Gavin, Frank; Jobson, Estelle; Markham, Sarah; Ricketts, Juanna; Baba, Ami; Butcher, Nancy J; Offringa, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Elsman EBM; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Smith M; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Hofstetter C; Patient Partner, Cochrane Consumer Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Gavin F; Patient and Public Contributor/Advisor, OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Jobson E; Patient and Public Contributor, Chair of the Public Advisory Council of The Health Data Research Network (Canada), Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Markham S; Patient and Public Contributor, EUPATI Fellow, Nyon, Switzerland.
  • Ricketts J; Patient and Public Contributor, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Baba A; Patient and Public Contributor, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Butcher NJ; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Offringa M; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Res Involv Engagem ; 10(1): 33, 2024 Mar 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515153
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In recent years, projects to develop reporting guidelines have attempted to integrate the perspectives of patients and public members. Best practices for patient and public involvement (PPI) in such projects have not yet been established. We recently developed an extension of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), to be used for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) PRISMA-COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) for OMIs 2024. Patients and public members formed a small but impactful stakeholder group. We critically evaluated the PPI component in this project and developed recommendations for conducting PPI when developing reporting guidelines. MAIN TEXT A patient partner was an integral research team member at the project development and grant application stage. Once the project started, five patient and public contributors (PPCs) were recruited to participate in the Delphi study; three PPCs contributed to subsequent steps. We collected quantitative feedback through surveys; qualitative feedback was garnered through a focus group discussion after the Delphi study and through debrief meetings after subsequent project activities. Feedback was thematically combined with reflections from the research team, and was predominantly positive. The following themes emerged importance of PPI partnership, number of PPCs involved, onboarding, design of Delphi surveys, flexibility in the process, complexity of PPI in methodological research, and power imbalances. Impacts of PPI on the content and presentation of the reporting guideline were evident, and reciprocal learning between PPCs and the research team occurred throughout the project. Lessons learned were translated into 17 recommendations for future projects.

CONCLUSION:

Integrating PPI in the development of PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 was feasible and considered valuable by PPCs and the research team. Our approach can be applied by others wishing to integrate PPI in developing reporting guidelines.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article