Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Waste analysis and energy use estimation during MR-HIFU treatment: first steps towards calculating total environmental impact.
Anneveldt, Kimberley J; Nijholt, Ingrid M; Schutte, Joke M; Hehenkamp, Wouter J K; Veersema, Sebastiaan; Huirne, Judith A F; Boomsma, Martijn F.
Afiliação
  • Anneveldt KJ; Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, 8025 AB, The Netherlands. k.j.anneveldt@isala.nl.
  • Nijholt IM; Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands. k.j.anneveldt@isala.nl.
  • Schutte JM; Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, 8025 AB, The Netherlands.
  • Hehenkamp WJK; Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
  • Veersema S; Department of Gynecology, Isala Hospital, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Huirne JAF; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
  • Boomsma MF; Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Insights Imaging ; 15(1): 83, 2024 Mar 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517607
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the environmental impact of the non-invasive Magnetic Resonance image-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment of uterine fibroids, we aimed to perform a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, as a full LCA was not feasible at this time, we evaluated the CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission from the MRI scanner, MR-HIFU device, and the medication used, and analyzed solid waste produced during treatment.

METHODS:

Our functional unit was one uterine fibroid MR-HIFU treatment. The moment the patient entered the day care-unit until she left, defined our boundaries of investigation. We retrospectively collected data from 25 treatments to assess the CO2 emission based on the energy used by the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device and the amount and type of medication administered. Solid waste was prospectively collected from five treatments.

RESULTS:

During an MR-HIFU treatment, the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device produced 33.2 ± 8.7 kg of CO2 emission and medication administered 0.13 ± 0.04 kg. A uterine fibroid MR-HIFU treatment produced 1.2 kg (range 1.1-1.4) of solid waste.

CONCLUSIONS:

Environmental impact should ideally be analyzed for all (new) medical treatments. By assessing part of the CO2 emission and solid waste produced, we have taken the first steps towards analyzing the total environmental impact of the MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids. These data can contribute to future studies comparing the results of MR-HIFU LCAs with LCAs of other uterine fibroid therapies. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT In addition to (cost-) effectiveness, the environmental impact of new treatments should be assessed. We took the first steps towards analyzing the total environmental impact of uterine fibroid MR-HIFU. KEY POINTS • Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) should be performed for all (new) medical treatments. • We took the first steps towards analyzing the environmental impact of uterine fibroid MR-HIFU. • Energy used by the MRI scanner and MR-HIFU device corresponded to 33.2 ± 8.7 kg of CO2 emission.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article