Fitness Level- and Sex-Related Differences in Pulmonary Limitations to Maximal Exercise in Normoxia and Hypoxia.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Both maximal-intensity exercise and altitude exposure challenge the pulmonary system that may reach its maximal capacities. Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH) are common in endurance-trained athletes. Furthermore, because of their smaller airways and lung size, women, independently of their fitness level, may be more prone to pulmonary limitations during maximal-intensity exercise, particularly when performed in hypoxic conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of sex and fitness level on pulmonary limitations during maximal exercise in normoxia and their consequences in acute hypoxia. METHODS: Fifty-one participants were distributed across four different groups according to sex and fitness level. Participants visited the laboratory on three occasions to perform maximal incremental cycling tests in normoxia and hypoxia (inspired oxygen fraction = 0.14) and two hypoxic chemosensitivity tests. Pulmonary function and ventilatory capacities were evaluated at each visit. RESULTS: EIH was more prevalent (62.5% vs 22.2%, P = 0.004) and EFL less common (37.5% vs 70.4%, P = 0.019) in women than men. EIH prevalence was different ( P = 0.004) between groups of trained men (41.7%), control men (6.7%), trained women (50.0%), and control women (75.0%). All EIH men but only 40% of EIH women exhibited EFL. EFL individuals had higher slope ratio ( P = 0.029), higher ventilation (V̇ E ) ( P < 0.001), larger ΔVO 2max ( P = 0.019), and lower hypoxia-related V̇ E increase ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women reported a higher EIH prevalence than men, regardless of their fitness level, despite a lower EFL prevalence. EFL seems mainly due to the imbalance between ventilatory demands and capacities. It restricts ventilation, leading to a larger performance impairment during maximal exercise in hypoxic conditions.