Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.
Abramson, Jeremy S; Solomon, Scott R; Arnason, Jon; Johnston, Patrick B; Glass, Bertram; Bachanova, Veronika; Ibrahimi, Sami; Mielke, Stephan; Mutsaers, Pim; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Francisco; Izutsu, Koji; Morschhauser, Franck; Lunning, Matthew; Crotta, Alessandro; Montheard, Sandrine; Previtali, Alessandro; Ogasawara, Ken; Kamdar, Manali.
Afiliação
  • Abramson JS; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Solomon SR; Transplant & Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Arnason J; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Johnston PB; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Glass B; Department of Hematology & Cell Therapy, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
  • Bachanova V; Division of Hematology, Oncology & Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Ibrahimi S; Transplant & Cellular Therapy Clinic, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • Mielke S; Departments of Laboratory Medicine & Medicine at Huddinge, Center of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Karolinska Institutet & University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mutsaers P; Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F; Department of Hematologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Izutsu K; Department of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Morschhauser F; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Lille, France.
  • Lunning M; Hematology/Oncology Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Crotta A; Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland.
  • Montheard S; Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland.
  • Previtali A; Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland.
  • Ogasawara K; Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Kamdar M; Division of Hematology, Hematologic Malignancies & Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Future Oncol ; : 1-11, 2024 Mar 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547003
What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article