Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Could the different surgical goals of fusion and non-fusion also be achieved in combination within the same patient? Clinical and radiological outcome of hybrid cervical spine surgery.
Heider, Franziska C; Kamenova, Maria; Wanke-Jellinek, Lorenz; Siepe, Christoph J; Mehren, Christoph.
Afiliação
  • Heider FC; Spine Center, Schoen Clinic Munich-Harlaching, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, Munich, Germany. fheider@schoen-klinik.de.
  • Kamenova M; Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. fheider@schoen-klinik.de.
  • Wanke-Jellinek L; Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. fheider@schoen-klinik.de.
  • Siepe CJ; Spine Center, Schoen Clinic Munich-Harlaching, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, Munich, Germany.
  • Mehren C; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J ; 33(6): 2287-2297, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553584
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Hybrid cervical spine surgery (HS) is a novel surgical strategy wherein an artificial disc replacement is done with a cervical fusion nearby with a stand-alone titanium cage to combine the advantages in both procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate interactions of these devices within the same patient, and to analyze, if the different goal of each implant is accomplished.

METHODS:

Thirty-six patients were treated surgically within a non-randomized retrospective study framework with HS. Patients were examined preoperatively followed by clinical and radiological examination at least one year postoperative. Clinical outcome was detected with NDI, VAS arm/neck, pain self-assessment questionnaires and subjective patient satisfaction. Radiological assessments included RoM, segmental lordosis, cervical lordosis of C2-C7, subsidence, ap-migration and heterotopic ossifications (HO) at the cTDR levels.

RESULTS:

Statistically significant improvement of all clinical scores was observed (NDI 37.5 to 5.76; VASarm 6.41 to 0.69; VASneck 6.78 to 1.48). Adequate RoM was achieved at cTDR levels. RoM in the ACDF levels was reduced statistically significant (p < 0.001), and solid fusion (> 2°) was achieved in all evaluated fusion level. Global lordosis (C2-C7) increased statistically significant (2.4° to 8.1°). Subsidence and HO at the cTDR levels did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS:

HS results in preservation of the segmental motion in the cTDR and fast and solid fusion in the cage cohort simultaneously. Patient safety was proven. In carefully selected cases, HS is a safe and viable treatment option by choosing the right "philosophy" level per level.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article