Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Audio Distraction for Traction Pin Insertion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Albersheim, Melissa; Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A; Doxey, Stephen A; Parikh, Harsh R; Boden, Allison L; Hernández-Irizarry, Roberto C; Horrigan, Patrick B; Quinnan, Stephen M; Cunningham, Brian P.
Afiliação
  • Albersheim M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Huyke-Hernández FA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.
  • Doxey SA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota.
  • Parikh HR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.
  • Boden AL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota.
  • Hernández-Irizarry RC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota.
  • Horrigan PB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HealthPartners Regions Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  • Quinnan SM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Cunningham BP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(12): 1069-1075, 2024 Jun 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598604
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Insertion of a skeletal traction pin in the distal femur or proximal tibia can be a painful and unpleasant experience for patients with a lower-extremity fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing patients with audio distraction (AD) during traction pin insertion can help to improve the patient-reported and the physician-reported experience and decrease pain and/or anxiety during the procedure.

METHODS:

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at 2 level-I trauma centers. Patients ≥18 years of age who were conscious and oriented and had a medical need for skeletal traction were included. Patients were randomized to receive AD or not receive AD during the procedure. All other procedure protocols were standardized and were the same for both groups. Surveys were completed by the patient and the physician immediately following the procedure. Patients rated their overall experience, pain, and anxiety during the procedure, and physicians rated the difficulty of the procedure, both on a 1-to-10 Likert scale.

RESULTS:

A total of 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight received AD and 26 did not. Femoral fractures were the most common injury (33 of 55, 60.0%). Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. The overall patient-reported procedure experience was similar between the AD and no-AD groups (3.9 ± 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1 to 4.7] versus 3.5 ± 2.2 [95% CI, 2.9 to 4.1], respectively; p = 0.55), as was pain (5.3 ± 3.2 [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.2] versus 6.1 ± 2.4 [95% CI, 5.4 to 6.8]; p = 0.28). However, anxiety levels were lower in the AD group (4.8 ± 3.3 [95% CI, 3.9 to 5.7] versus 7.1 ± 2.8 [95% CI, 6.3 to 7.9]; p = 0.007). Physician-reported procedure difficulty was similar between the groups (2.6 ± 2.0 [95% CI, 2.1 to 3.1] versus 2.8 ± 1.7 [95% CI, 2.3 to 3.3]; p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS:

AD is a practical, low-cost intervention that may reduce patient anxiety during lower-extremity skeletal traction pin insertion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Tração / Fraturas do Fêmur Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Tração / Fraturas do Fêmur Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article