Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Clopidogrel vs Alternative P2Y12 Inhibitors Based on the ABCD-GENE Score.
Thomas, Cameron D; Franchi, Francesco; Rossi, Joseph S; Keeley, Ellen C; Anderson, R David; Beitelshees, Amber L; Duarte, Julio D; Ortega-Paz, Luis; Gong, Yan; Kerensky, Richard A; Kulick, Natasha; McDonough, Caitrin W; Nguyen, Anh B; Wang, Yehua; Winget, Marshall; Yang, William E; Johnson, Julie A; Winterstein, Almut G; Stouffer, George A; Angiolillo, Dominick J; Lee, Craig R; Cavallari, Larisa H.
Afiliação
  • Thomas CD; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Franchi F; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Rossi JS; Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Keeley EC; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Anderson RD; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Beitelshees AL; Department of Medicine and Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Duarte JD; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Ortega-Paz L; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Gong Y; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Kerensky RA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Kulick N; Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill,
  • McDonough CW; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Nguyen AB; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Wang Y; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy and Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Winget M; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Yang WE; Department of Medicine and Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Johnson JA; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Winterstein AG; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy and Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Stouffer GA; Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Angiolillo DJ; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Lee CR; Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill,
  • Cavallari LH; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: lcavallari@cop.ufl.edu.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(15): 1370-1381, 2024 Apr 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599713
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An ABCD-GENE (age, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and CYP2C19 genetic variants) score ≥10 predicts reduced clopidogrel effectiveness, but its association with response to alternative therapy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between ABCD-GENE score and the effectiveness of clopidogrel vs alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS:

A total of 4,335 patients who underwent PCI, CYP2C19 genotyping, and P2Y12 inhibitor treatment were included. The primary outcome was major atherothrombotic events (MAE) within 1 year after PCI. Cox regression was performed to assess event risk in clopidogrel-treated (reference) vs alternatively treated patients, with stabilized inverse probability weights derived from exposure propensity scores after stratifying by ABCD-GENE score and further by CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) genotype.

RESULTS:

Among patients with scores <10 (n = 3,200), MAE was not different with alternative therapy vs clopidogrel (weighted HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.65-1.22; P = 0.475). The risk for MAE also did not significantly differ by treatment among patients with scores ≥10 (n = 1,135; weighted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.51-1.11; P = 0.155). Among CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers, MAE risk appeared lower with alternative therapy in both the group with scores <10 (weighted HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.25-1.01; P = 0.052) and the group with scores ≥10 (weighted HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.80; P = 0.004), while there was no difference in the group with scores <10 and no LOF alleles (weighted HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.70-1.51; P = 0.885).

CONCLUSIONS:

These data support the use of alternative therapy over clopidogrel in CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers after PCI, regardless of ABCD-GENE score, while clopidogrel is as effective as alternative therapy in non-LOF patients with scores <10.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article