Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound utilization between radiology and point of care ultrasound in first trimester pregnancy.
Thom, Christopher; Livingstone, Kevin; Ottenhoff, Jakob; Han, David; Martindale, James; Moak, James.
Afiliação
  • Thom C; University of Virginia Health System, USA. Electronic address: ct9k@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu.
  • Livingstone K; University of Virginia Health System, USA.
  • Ottenhoff J; University of Virginia Health System, USA.
  • Han D; University of Virginia Health System, USA.
  • Martindale J; University of Virginia Health System, USA.
  • Moak J; University of Virginia Health System, USA.
Am J Emerg Med ; 80: 143-148, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604108
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transvaginal (TVUS) and transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) are both utilized in the evaluation of early pregnancy patients. While many practitioners using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) will generally not pursue TVUS in cases where an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is visualized on TAUS, this may not be true in Radiology performed ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate for differences in transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) utilization between Radiology performed (RP) ultrasound and point of care ultrasound (POCUS) by Emergency Department (ED) physicians in early pregnancy patients. Secondarily, to assess length of stay (LOS) differences and the impact of specialized emergency ultrasound training on TVUS utilization.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study at a single academic ED. Study population was all ED patients who underwent first trimester ultrasound during the one year period of March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. Variables evaluated were chief complaint, gestational age, LOS, TAUS and TVUS utilization, ultrasound findings, and ultrasound specialty training of the ED physician.

RESULTS:

There were 133 cases of POCUS ultrasound and 254 cases of RP ultrasound. All cases had TAUS imaging performed. Median LOS for patients when POCUS was utilized was 207 min (IQR 151-294) and 258 min (IQR 208-328) for those only using RP ultrasound, p ≤ 0.001. In the POCUS cohort, 38% (95% CI 30%-46%) received TVUS, while 94% received TVUS in the RP cohort (95% CI 90%-96%), p ≤ 0.001. Patients seen by ED faculty with ultrasound specialty training had TVUS 53% of the time (95% CI 41%-65%), while those seen by other ED faculty had TVUS 79% (95% CI 74%-83%) of the time, p = 0.035.

CONCLUSION:

POCUS in early pregnancy is associated with a significant reduction in TVUS usage. We suspect that POCUS users elect not to pursue TVUS after an IUP is identified on TAUS, while technicians perform protocol-based TVUS irrespective of TAUS findings. Patients seen by ultrasound trained ED physicians are less likely to receive TVUS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article