Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Local Programmatic Decisions on Outcomes in Transplant-Listed Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.
Akbar, Armaan F; Shou, Benjamin L; Kilic, Ahmet; Cedars, Ari M.
Afiliação
  • Akbar AF; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Shou BL; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Kilic A; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Cedars AM; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: acedars1@jhmi.edu.
J Card Fail ; 2024 Apr 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616008
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We investigated variables impacting waitlist times and negative waitlist outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) who were waiting for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) after the 2018 allocation change.

METHODS:

Adult candidates for OHT who were listed between 10/18/2018 and 12/31/2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized as ACHD vs non-ACHD. Waitlist time and time to upgrade for those upgraded into status 1-3 were compared by using rank-sum tests. Death/delisting for deterioration was assessed by using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs).

RESULTS:

Of 15,424 OHT candidates, 589 (3.8%) were ACHD. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates had less urgent status at initial listing (4.2% vs 4.7% listed at status 1; 17.2% vs 23.7% listed at status 2; P < 0.001), but not final listing (5.9% vs 7.6% final status 1; 35.6% vs 36.8% final status 2; P < 0.001). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates upgraded into status 1 (65.0 vs 30.0 days; P = 0.09) and status 2 (113.0 vs 64.0 days; P = 0.003) spent longer times on the waitlist. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates spent longer times waiting for an upgrade into status 1 (51.4 vs 17.6 days; P = 0.027) and status 2 (76.7 vs 34.7 days; P = 0.003). Once upgraded, there was no difference between groups in waitlist time to status 1 (9.7 vs 5.5 days = 0.66). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates with a final status of 1 (20.0% vs 8.6%; SHR 2.47 [95%CI = 1.19-5.16]; P = 0.02) and 2 (8.9% vs 2.3%; SHR 3.59 [95%CI = 2.18-5.91]; P < 0.001) experienced higher rates of death and deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS:

ACHD candidates have longer waitlist times, have lower priority status at initial listing, wait longer for upgrades, and have higher mortality rates at the same final status as non-ACHD candidates, suggesting that they are being upgraded too late.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article