Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of In Vitro Measurement and Ultrasound for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Premature Infants: A Before-and-After Self-Controlled Prospective Study.
He, Shasha; Wang, Jianhui; Zhang, Xianhong; Xie, Jia; Wan, Qingxuan; He, Ruiyun; Chen, Yanhan; Liu, Xuexiu.
Afiliação
  • He S; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Wang J; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Zhang X; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Xie J; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Wan Q; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • He R; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Chen Y; College of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
  • Liu X; Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, CHN.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56335, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633952
ABSTRACT
Background This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) and in vitro measurement (IVM) methods in localizing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in premature infants and analyze the relevant factors affecting the accuracy of IVM. Methodology The study employs a prospective before-and-after self-controlled clinical trial design. A total of 210 premature infants who underwent PICC catheterization were compared. We assessed the rate of catheter tip placement, consistency, and stability and analyzed the relevant factors. Results The study enrolled a total of 202 premature infants after eight infants dropped out. The one-time positioning rates of the PICC catheter tip using US and IVM were 100% and 73.8%, respectively. Concerning IVM, 53 (26.2%) patients did not reach the optimal position, with 24 (11.8%) patients having a shallow position and 29 (14.3%) having a deep position. The consistency of the two methods was 0.782 (p < 0.05). The degree of dispersion of US was 0.2 (0.0-0.4) cm, which was significantly smaller than IVM at 1.5 (0.0-1.8) cm. Gestational age less than 32 weeks (odds ratio (OR) = 6.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-30.81), weight less than 1,500 g (OR = 5.85, 95% CI = 2.11-16.20), body length less than 40 cm (OR = 15.36, 95% CI = 4.47-52.72), mechanical ventilation (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.77-14.83), abdominal distension (OR = 78.18, 95% CI = 10.62-575.22), and bloating (OR = 8.81, 95% CI = 1.42-47.00) were risk factors that affected the accuracy of IVM. Conclusions Gestational age, weight, length, mechanical ventilation, abdominal distension, and swelling can lead to deviations with IVM. US can directly view the tip of the catheter, which is more accurate. Additionally, it is recommended to reduce the length of the catheter by 1.3 cm when using IVM to achieve the best-estimated placement length.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article