Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low anterolateral incision for single-port extraperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty: description of technique and initial experience.
Ramos, Roxana; Chavali, Jaya S; Ferguson, Ethan; Soputro, Nicolas; Geskin, Albert; Rhee, Audrey; Kaouk, Jihad.
Afiliação
  • Ramos R; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Chavali JS; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Ferguson E; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Soputro N; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Geskin A; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Rhee A; WakeMed Raleigh Campus, Raleigh, NC, 27610, USA.
  • Kaouk J; Glickman Urologic & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. kaoukj@ccf.org.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 263, 2024 Apr 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668859
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aims to describe the surgical steps for the single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty, report its feasibility, and share the initial outcomes of our experience.

METHODS:

We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The surgical steps included a pure single-port approach through a 3.5 cm low anterolateral incision two fingerbreadths above the superior pubic ramus. The ureter was localized and followed cranially, a dismembered pyeloplasty was performed, and a running ureteropelvic anastomosis was completed. No drains were placed. The urinary catheter was removed upon discharge, and the ureteral stent after 3-5 weeks.

RESULTS:

A total of eight cases (two adults and six children) were completed successfully, without complications or conversions. Median operative time, console time, and estimated blood loss were 208.5 min, 114.5 min, and 10.0 ml, respectively. All patients were discharged within 24 h, except for one that required urinary output observation due to retention. There were no major postoperative complications. The median pain score at discharge was 0/10. Only one patient was prescribed PRN opioids at discharge. The readmission rate was 0.0%. All patients were asymptomatic on their last follow-up with no definitive obstruction on imaging, and no requirement for additional procedures or stents.

CONCLUSION:

Single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative for surgical treatment of UPJO in adult and pediatric patients with improved recovery outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Obstrução Ureteral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Pelve Renal Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Obstrução Ureteral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Pelve Renal Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article