Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Growth Performance of Buffalo Calves in Response to Different Diets with and without Saccharomyces cerevisiae Supplementation.
Zicarelli, Fabio; Iommelli, Piera; Musco, Nadia; Wanapat, Metha; Lotito, Daria; Lombardi, Pietro; Infascelli, Federico; Tudisco, Raffaella.
Afiliação
  • Zicarelli F; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Iommelli P; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Musco N; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Wanapat M; Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
  • Lotito D; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Lombardi P; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Infascelli F; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
  • Tudisco R; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Animals (Basel) ; 14(8)2024 Apr 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672393
ABSTRACT
The aim of the present trial was to evaluate the growth performance of buffalo calves fed on diets characterized by different forage/concentrate ratios, with or without Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation (CBS 493.94, Yea-Sacc®). Twenty-four male buffalo calves (mean age of 145.1 ± 16.1 days; mean weight of 108.0 ± 18.7 kg) were assigned randomly to 4 groups, homogeneous in age, that were fed four different diets diet 1, FC ratio 5050; diet 2, FC ratio 3070; diet 3, FC ratio 5050 + Yea-Sacc®; and diet 4, FC ratio 3070 + Yea-Sacc®. Buffalo calves were individually weighted before the start of the experiment and the data were used as a covariate, being taken monthly until the end of the trial. Dry matter intake (DMI), daily weight gain (DWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. The differences in diets composition significantly (p < 0.01) affected all these parameters. In particular, the animals fed diet 1 and diet 3 showed higher values of DWG (0.91 and 0.88 g/d vs. 0.68 and 0.66 for group 2 and 4) and DMI (5.8 and 5.3 kg/d, respectively) compared to the other groups (4.3 and 4.4 kg/d for group 2 and 4), as well as a higher final body weight (370.5 and 334.1 kg for group 1 and 3 vs. 272.8 and 273.1 kg of group 2 and 4, respectively). Indeed, the supplementation with Yea-Sacc® at the dosage of 1 × 10E8 did not affect buffaloes' growth performance.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article