Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.
Neuhaus, Klaus W; Kühnisch, Jan; Banerjee, Avijit; Martignon, Stefania; Ricketts, David; Schwendicke, Falk; van der Veen, Monique H; Doméjean, Sophie; Fontana, Margherita; Lussi, Adrian; Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita; Mendes, Fausto Medeiros; Douglas, Gail; Schmalz, Gottfried; Campus, Guglielmo; Aps, Johan; Horner, Keith; Opdam, Niek; Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte; Splieth, Christian H.
Afiliação
  • Neuhaus KW; Department of Pediatric Oral Health, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel (UZB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Kühnisch J; Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Banerjee A; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Martignon S; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Ricketts D; Conservative and MI Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Schwendicke F; UNICA - Caries Research Unit, Research Department, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • van der Veen MH; Unit of Restorative Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
  • Doméjean S; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Fontana M; Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Lussi A; Departments of Preventive Dentistry and Paediatric Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jablonski-Momeni A; Oral Hygiene School, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mendes FM; Département d'Odontologie Conservatrice, UFR d'Odontologie, Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Douglas G; Service d'Odontologie, CHU Estaing Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Schmalz G; Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Campus G; Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Aps J; University Hospital for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Horner K; Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Opdam N; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Huysmans MC; Department of Dental Public Health, University of Leeds School of Dentistry, Leeds, UK.
  • Splieth CH; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Caries Res ; : 1, 2024 Apr 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684147
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This consensus paper provides recommendations for oral health professionals on why and how to assess caries activity and progression with special respect to the site of a lesion.

METHODS:

An expert panel was nominated by the executive councils of the European Organization for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD). The steering committee built three working groups that were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity and progression assessment, and (3) obtain individualized caries diagnoses. The experts of work group 2 phrased and agreed on provisional general and specific recommendations on caries lesion activity and progression, based on a review of the current literature. These recommendations were then discussed and refined in a consensus workshop followed by an anonymous Delphi survey to determine the agreement on each recommendation.

RESULTS:

The expert panel agreed on general (n = 7) and specific recommendations (n = 6). The specific recommendations cover coronal caries on pits and fissures, smooth surfaces, proximal surfaces, as well as root caries and secondary caries/caries adjacent to restorations and sealants. 3/13 recommendations yielded perfect agreement.

CONCLUSION:

The most suitable method for lesion activity assessment is the visual-tactile method. No single clinical characteristic is indicative of lesion activity; instead, lesion activity assessment is based on assessing and weighing several clinical signs. The recall intervals for visual and radiographic examination need to be adjusted to the presence of active caries lesions and recent caries progression rates. Modifications should be based on individual patient characteristics.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article