Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of modern dual-mobility intraprosthetic dissociations.
Mallett, Katherine E; Guarin Perez, Sergio F; Taunton, Michael J; Sierra, Rafael J.
Afiliação
  • Mallett KE; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Guarin Perez SF; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Taunton MJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Sierra RJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(5 Supple B): 98-104, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688511
ABSTRACT

Aims:

Dual-mobility (DM) components are increasingly used to prevent and treat dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Intraprosthetic dissociation (IPD) is a rare complication of DM that is believed to have decreased with contemporary implants. This study aimed to report incidence, treatment, and outcomes of contemporary DM IPD.

Methods:

A total of 1,453 DM components were implanted at a single academic institution between January 2010 and December 2021 695 in primary and 758 in revision THA. Of these, 49 presented with a dislocation of the large DM head and five presented with an IPD. At the time of closed reduction of the large DM dislocation, six additional IPDs occurred. The mean age was 64 years (SD 9.6), 54.5% were female (n = 6), and mean follow-up was 4.2 years (SD 1.8). Of the 11 IPDs, seven had a history of instability, five had abductor insufficiency, four had prior lumbar fusion, and two were conversions for failed fracture management.

Results:

The incidence of IPD was 0.76%. Of the 11 IPDs, ten were missed either at presentation or after attempted reduction. All ten patients with a missed IPD were discharged with a presumed reduction. The mean time from IPD to surgical treatment was three weeks (0 to 23). One patient died after IPD prior to revision. Of the ten remaining hips with IPD, the DM head was exchanged in two, four underwent acetabular revision with DM exchange, and four were revised to a constrained liner. Of these, five (50%) underwent reoperation at a mean 1.8 years (SD 0.73), including one additional acetabular revision. No patients who underwent initial acetabular revision for IPD treatment required subsequent reoperation.

Conclusion:

The overall rate of IPD was low at 0.76%. It is essential to identify an IPD on radiographs as the majority were missed at presentation or after iatrogenic dissociation. Surgeons should consider acetabular revision for IPD to allow conversion to a larger DM head, and take care to remove impinging structures that may increase the risk of subsequent failure.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article