Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is There a Learning Curve for the 5-Year Implant Survival Rate of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach With a Traction Table? A Prospective Cohort Study.
Nakamura, Junichi; Hagiwara, Shigeo; Kawarai, Yuya; Hirasawa, Rui; Akazawa, Tsutomu; Ohtori, Seiji.
Afiliação
  • Nakamura J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba city, Chiba, Japan.
  • Hagiwara S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba city, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kawarai Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba city, Chiba, Japan.
  • Hirasawa R; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba city, Chiba, Japan.
  • Akazawa T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Ohtori S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba city, Chiba, Japan.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 May 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710345
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is attracting attention as a minimally invasive surgery, but the learning curve to master this approach is a concern, and its effect on long-term results is unknown. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to clarify how the learning curve affects the 5-year results of DAA THA with a traction table.

METHODS:

Of 402 THA cases using DAA with a mobile traction table and fluoroscopy, 249 cases composed of the first 50 cases for each surgeon were assessed during a learning curve, and 153 cases were evaluated after more than 50 cases of experience.

RESULTS:

The 5-year-implant survival rate was 99.2% both during and after the learning curve. The 2-year complication rate in the learning curve group was 8.9 versus 5.9%, which was not statistically significant. The 2-to-5-year complication rates also did not differ between the cohorts (0 versus 0.7%). Both groups demonstrated decreased complication rates when comparing 2-year complications to 2-to-5-year complications. Clinical scores significantly improved by 2 years and were maintained at 5 years in both groups. The cup safe-zone success rates were 96.4% during the learning curve and 98.7% after the learning curve. The stem safe-zone success rates were 97.2% during the learning curve and 96.1% after the learning curve. Surgical time was approximately 20 minutes shorter after the first 50 cases than during the learning curve (70.8 versus 90.6 minutes, P = .001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less after the learning curve than during the learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study implies that the learning curve affects perioperative results such as surgical time and intraoperative blood loss, but has little effect on short-term results up to 2 years after surgery and no effect on mid-term results from 2 to 5 years after surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article