Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conscience-Based Barriers to Medical Aid in Dying: A Survey of Colorado Physicians.
Hamer, Mika K; Baugh, Christine M; Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana; Kessler, Elizabeth R; Kini, Vinay; Lum, Hillary D; Ressalam, Julie; Campbell, Eric G.
Afiliação
  • Hamer MK; Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. mika.hamer@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Baugh CM; Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Bolcic-Jankovic D; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Kessler ER; Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kini V; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Lum HD; Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ressalam J; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Campbell EG; Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2024 May 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710866
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 20% of the United States' population lives in a state or jurisdiction where medical aid in dying (MAiD) is legal. It is unknown how physicians' own barriers are associated with their provision of the spectrum of MAiD services.

OBJECTIVE:

To measure physicians' religious and/or ethical barriers to providing MAiD services and how such barriers relate to physicians' intentions and behaviors.

DESIGN:

Three-wave cross-sectional survey fielded in Colorado in 2020-2021.

PARTICIPANTS:

Physicians providing care to patients likely clinically eligible for MAiD according to probabilistic sampling. MAIN

MEASURES:

Physicians self-reported barriers to their own participation in MAiD. We considered large ethical and/or religious barriers to be conscience-based barriers. We measured physicians' self-reported intention to participate and self-reported prior participation in MAiD since it was legalized in Colorado in 2017. We estimated differences in intention and behavior outcomes according to presence of conscience-based barriers, adjusting for physician gender, race/ethnicity, time in practice, and specialty. KEY

RESULTS:

Among 300 respondents, 26% reported "large" ethical and/or religious barriers to their involvement in MAiD. Physicians with longer time in practice and those identifying as non-White were more likely to report conscience-based barriers to MAiD. Comparing physicians with and without conscience-based barriers to MAiD, we found no difference in ancillary participation (discussing, referring) but significant differences in direct participation (serving as consultant [5% vs. 31%] or attending [0% vs. 22%]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Approximately one-quarter of physicians likely to care for MAiD-eligible patients in Colorado reported religious and/or ethical barriers to MAiD. Despite religious and/or ethical barriers, the vast majority of physicians were willing to discuss MAiD and/or refer patients seeking MAiD services. These data provide important empirical foundation for policy from hospitals and health systems as well as medical specialty groups with official positions on MAiD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article