Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External cephalic version - single-center experience.
Kwiatek, Maciej; Geca, Tomasz; Stupak, Aleksandra; Kwasniewski, Wojciech; Mlak, Radoslaw; Kwasniewska, Anna.
Afiliação
  • Kwiatek M; Department of Obstetrcis and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland. maciej.kwiatek@umlub.pl.
  • Geca T; Department of Obstetrcis and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland.
  • Stupak A; Department of Obstetrcis and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland.
  • Kwasniewski W; Department of Oncological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland.
  • Mlak R; Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland.
  • Kwasniewska A; Department of Obstetrcis and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Poland.
Ginekol Pol ; 2024 May 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717219
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

External cephalic version (ECV) is an alternative to caesarean section for abnormal fetal position. ECV is recommended by the most important scientific committees in the world. ECV complications are rare and occur in 6.1% of cases, however severe complications requiring urgent caesarean section are found in less than 0.4%. Our aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of ECV and to present our own experience with the procedure of ECV. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

ECV was performed on 62 patients (32 nulliparas and 30 multiparas). Qualification criteria included singleton gestation, gestational age > 36 + 6, longitudinal pelvic lie, no uterine contractions, intact membranes. Indications for immediate cesarean section within 24 hours of ECV were considered a procedural complication. In patients with complications, the condition of the newborn was checked according to the APGAR score and the day of discharge of the mother and child from the maternity ward was analyzed.

RESULTS:

ECV finished successfully in 66.1% (nulliparas 56.2% and multiparas 76.7%). Patients with a successful ECV were significantly older and had higher median gestational age. ECV was more often successful when placenta was located on the posteriori wall. In our patients, there were 4 cases of complications requiring delivery at the time of ECV. No serious consequences associated with increased maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

ECV seems to be a safe alternative for women wishing to deliver vaginally, as this procedure does not increase the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article