Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential effect of China's Zero Markup Drug Policy on provider-induced demand in secondary and tertiary hospitals.
Zhang, Xiaoxi; Zimmerman, Armand; Lai, Hongyu; Zhang, Yanyan; Tang, Zhongyi; Tang, Shenglan; Ogbuoji, Osondu.
Afiliação
  • Zhang X; School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Zimmerman A; Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Lai H; School of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang Y; Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.
  • Tang Z; Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China.
  • Tang S; Duke Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Ogbuoji O; Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1229722, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721544
ABSTRACT
Following the marketization of China's health system in the 1980's, the government allowed public hospitals to markup the price of certain medications by 15% to compensate for reduced revenue from government subsidies. This incentivized clinicians to induce patient demand for drugs which resulted in higher patient out-of-pocket payments, higher overall medical expenditure, and poor health outcomes. In 2009, China introduced the Zero Markup Drug Policy (ZMDP) which eliminated the 15% markup. Using Shanghai as a case study, this paper analyzes emerging and existing evidence about the impact of ZMDP on hospital expenditure and revenue across secondary and tertiary public hospitals. We use data from 150 public hospitals across Shanghai to examine changes in hospital expenditure and revenue for various health services following the implementation of ZMDP. Our analysis suggests that, across both secondary and tertiary hospitals, the implementation of ZMDP reduced expenditure on drugs but increased expenditure on medical services, exams, and tests thereby increasing hospital revenue and keeping inpatient and outpatient costs unchanged. Moreover, our analysis suggests that tertiary facilities increased their revenue at a faster rate than secondary facilities, likely due to their ability to prescribe more advanced and, therefore, more costly procedures. While rigorous experimental designs are needed to confirm these findings, it appears that ZMDP has not reduced instances of medical expenditure provoked by provider-induced demand (PID) but rather shifted the effect of PID from one revenue source to another with differential effects in secondary vs. tertiary hospitals. Supplemental policies are likely needed to address PID and reduce patient costs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros de Atenção Terciária Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros de Atenção Terciária Limite: Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article