Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds.
Zoric, Andreas; Bagheri, Mahsa; von Kohout, Maria; Fardoust, Tara; Fuchs, Paul C; Schiefer, Jennifer L; Opländer, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Zoric A; Plastic, Reconstructive, and Esthetic Surgery, RKH Hospital Bietigheim-Vaihingen, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany.
  • Bagheri M; Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany.
  • von Kohout M; Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Burn Center, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Fardoust T; Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Fuchs PC; Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Burn Center, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Schiefer JL; Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Burn Center, Cologne-Merheim Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Opländer C; Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726645
ABSTRACT

Background:

Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for septic mortality of burn patients. High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections.

Methods:

Antibacterial effects of an light-emitting diode (LED) array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT).

Results:

The aBL reduced the bacterial number (2.51-3.56 log10 CFU/mL), whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. The aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60%-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. In this study, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extent than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU).

Conclusions:

The aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article