Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review.
Lacson, Roger; Yu, Yufei; Kuo, Tsung-Ting; Ohno-Machado, Lucila.
Afiliação
  • Lacson R; Department of Biomedical Informatics & Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
  • Yu Y; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
  • Kuo TT; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
  • Ohno-Machado L; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 31(6): 1423-1435, 2024 May 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726710
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Blockchain has emerged as a potential data-sharing structure in healthcare because of its decentralization, immutability, and traceability. However, its use in the biomedical domain is yet to be investigated comprehensively, especially from the aspects of implementation and evaluation, by existing blockchain literature reviews. To address this, our review assesses blockchain applications implemented in practice and evaluated with quantitative metrics. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This systematic review adapts the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework to review biomedical blockchain papers published by August 2023 from 3 databases. Blockchain application, implementation, and evaluation metrics were collected and summarized.

RESULTS:

Following screening, 11 articles were included in this review. Articles spanned a range of biomedical applications including COVID-19 medical data sharing, decentralized internet of things (IoT) data storage, clinical trial management, biomedical certificate storage, electronic health record (EHR) data sharing, and distributed predictive model generation. Only one article demonstrated blockchain deployment at a medical facility.

DISCUSSION:

Ethereum was the most common blockchain platform. All but one implementation was developed with private network permissions. Also, 8 articles contained storage speed metrics and 6 contained query speed metrics. However, inconsistencies in presented metrics and the small number of articles included limit technological comparisons with each other.

CONCLUSION:

While blockchain demonstrates feasibility for adoption in healthcare, it is not as popular as currently existing technologies for biomedical data management. Addressing implementation and evaluation factors will better showcase blockchain's practical benefits, enabling blockchain to have a significant impact on the health sector.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blockchain Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blockchain Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article