Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The landscape of liver transplantation for patients with alcohol-associated liver disease in the United States.
Vock, David M; Humphreville, Vanessa; Ramanathan, Karthik V; Adams, Andrew B; Lim, Nicholas; Nguyen, Vinh H; Wothe, Jillian K; Chinnakotla, Srinath.
Afiliação
  • Vock DM; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Humphreville V; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Ramanathan KV; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Adams AB; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lim N; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Nguyen VH; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wothe JK; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Chinnakotla S; Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Liver Transpl ; 2024 May 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727598
ABSTRACT
Indications for liver transplants have expanded to include patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) over the last decade. Concurrently, the liver allocation policy was updated in February 2020 replacing the Donor Service Area with Acuity Circles (ACs). The aim is to compare the transplantation rate, waitlist outcomes, and posttransplant survival of candidates with ALD to non-ALD and assess differences in that effect after the implementation of the AC policy. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients data for adult candidates for liver transplant were reviewed from the post-AC era (February 4, 2020-March 1, 2022) and compared with an equivalent length of time before ACs were implemented. The adjusted transplant rates were significantly higher for those with ALD before AC, and this difference increased after AC implementation (transplant rate ratio comparing ALD to non-ALD = 1.20, 1.13, 1.61, and 1.32 for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease categories 37-40, 33-36, 29-32, and 25-28, respectively, in the post-AC era, p < 0.05 for all). The adjusted likelihood of death/removal from the waitlist was lower for patients with ALD across all lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease categories (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.70, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.70 for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease categories 25-28, 20-24, 15-19, 6-14, respectively, p < 0.05). Adjusted posttransplant survival was better for those with ALD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.81, p < 0.05). Waiting list and posttransplant mortality tended to improve more for those with ALD since the implementation of AC but not significantly. ALD is a growing indication for liver transplantation. Although patients with ALD continue to have excellent posttransplant outcomes and lower waitlist mortality, candidates with ALD have higher adjusted transplant rates, and these differences have increased after AC implementation.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article