Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antiseptic management of critical wounds: differential bacterial response upon exposure to antiseptics and first insights into antiseptic/phage interactions - experimental studies.
Tagliaferri, Thaysa Leite; Rhode, Sophie; Munoz, Priscilla; Simon, Kevin; Krüttgen, Alex; Stoppe, Christian; Ruhl, Tim; Beier, Justus P; Horz, Hans-Peter; Kim, Bong-Sung.
Afiliação
  • Tagliaferri TL; Institute of Medical Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Rhode S; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery - Burn Center, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Munoz P; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
  • Simon K; Institute of Medical Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Krüttgen A; Institute of Medical Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Stoppe C; Laboratory Diagnostic Center, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Ruhl T; University Hospital, Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Beier JP; Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Horz HP; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery - Burn Center, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
  • Kim BS; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery - Burn Center, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Int J Surg ; 2024 May 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742847
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With the antibiotic crisis, the topical antibacterial control including chronic wounds gains increasing importance. However, little is known regarding tolerance development when bacteria face repetitive exposure to the identical antiseptics as commonly found in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We exposed clinical isolates foremost of chronic wounds in vitro to dilutions of two antisepctics used for wound therapy polyhexanide or octenidine. Adaptive response was determined by growth/kill curves, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), and whole genome sequencing. Antiseptic/bacteriophage combinations were studied by liquid-infection assays and bacterial plating.

RESULTS:

Polyhexanide acted stronger against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis while octenidine was more potent against Staphylococcus aureus. Otherwise, the antiseptic efficacy varied across isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Upon repetitive exposure with constant antiseptic concentrations P. aeruginosa and P. mirabilis adaptation was evident by a reduced lag-phase and a two-fold increased MIC. Under increasing octenidine concentrations, P. aeruginosa adapted to an eightfold higher dosage with mutations in smvA, opgH and kinB affecting an efflux pump, alginate and biofilm formation, respectively. S. aureus adapted to a fourfold increase of polyhexanide with a mutation in the multiple peptide resistance factor MprF, also conferring cross-resistance to daptomycin. Antiseptic/bacteriophage combinations enhanced bacterial inhibition and delayed adaptation.

CONCLUSION:

Different bacterial species/strains respond unequally to low-level antiseptic concentrations. Bacterial adaptation potential at phenotypic and genotypic levels may indicate the necessity for a more nuanced selection of antiseptics. Bacteriophages represent a promising yet underexplored strategy for supporting antiseptic treatment which may be particularly beneficial for the management of critical wounds.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article