Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Follow-Up of a Person-Centered Prehabilitation Program Based on Cognitive-Behavioral Physical Therapy for Patients Scheduled for Lumbar Fusion.
Kemani, Mike K; Hanafi, Rikard; Brisby, Helena; Lotzke, Hanna; Lundberg, Mari.
Afiliação
  • Kemani MK; Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hanafi R; Stress Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Brisby H; Department of Health Professionals, Theme Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
  • Lotzke H; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lundberg M; Back in Motion Research Group, Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Phys Ther ; 104(8)2024 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753831
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Long-term follow-ups of prehabilitation programs for lumbar spine surgery are lacking, and more comprehensive evaluations are needed. In the current study, we evaluated the long-term effects of a prehabilitation program compared with conventional care in relation to lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative disc disease.

METHODS:

Patients (n = 118) receiving lumbar fusion surgery were included in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, involving 1 university hospital and 2 spine clinics. The intervention was a person-centered prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy that targeted psychological presurgical risk factors, physical activity, and overall health. The control group received conventional preoperative care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included assessments at 8 time-points low back disability (primary outcome), back pain intensity, leg pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety and depressive mood, health-related quality of life, and patient-specific functioning. Physical activity and physical capacity were assessed at 5 time points. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of the intervention.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences between groups at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups for any outcome, except for the One Leg Stand test 1 year following surgery, in favor of the control group. There were significant improvements for both groups, from baseline to the 12- and 24-month follow-ups for all physical capacity test and patient-reported outcome measures, except for leg pain and self-efficacy for exercise.

CONCLUSION:

No long-term effects were found for the prehabilitation program compared to conventional care. Physical activity did not improve over time, despite significantly improved self-reported functioning and physical capacity measurements. IMPACT These findings have implications for the current understanding of the long-term effects of prehabilitation and suggest that future research should focus on programs promoting physical activity both before and after lumbar spine surgery to decrease the risk of long-term adverse health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Exercício Pré-Operatório / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Exercício Pré-Operatório / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article