Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of the Atri-Risk Conduction Index risk score to predict risk of atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation.
Grubb, Alex; Aleong, Ryan; Rosenberg, Michael A; Chang, Shu; Padalia, Kishan; Ashur, Carmel; Adewumi, Joseph; Saqi, Bilal; Varela, Daniel; Sandhu, Amneet; Cerbin, Lukasz; Barrett, Christopher; Tumolo, Alexis Z; Varosy, Paul; Zipse, Matthew M; Tzou, Wendy S; Garg, Lohit; Sabzwari, Syed Rafay A.
Afiliação
  • Grubb A; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Aleong R; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Rosenberg MA; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Chang S; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Padalia K; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Ashur C; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Adewumi J; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Saqi B; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Varela D; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Sandhu A; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Cerbin L; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Barrett C; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
  • Tumolo AZ; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Varosy P; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Zipse MM; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Tzou WS; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Garg L; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Sabzwari SRA; Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: Rafay.Sabzwari@cuanschutz.edu.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 May 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762137
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Identification of patients at risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) after typical atrial flutter (tAFL) ablation is important to guide monitoring and treatment.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to create and validate a risk score to predict AF after tAFL ablation

METHODS:

We identified patients who underwent tAFL ablation with no AF history between 2017 and 2022 and randomly allocated to derivation and validation cohorts. We collected clinical variables and measured conduction parameters in sinus rhythm on an electrophysiology recording system (CardioLab, GE Healthcare). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions (LogR) were used to evaluate association with AF development.

RESULTS:

A total of 242 consecutive patients (81% male; mean age 66 ± 11 years) were divided into derivation (n =142) and validation (n = 100) cohorts. Forty-two percent developed AF over median follow-up of 330 days. In multivariate LogR (derivation cohort), proximal to distal coronary sinus time (pCS-dCS) ≥70 ms (odds ratio [OR] 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-49), pCS time ≥36 ms (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.5-13), and CHADS2-VASc score ≥3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.6-11.8) were independently associated with new AF during follow-up. The Atri-Risk Conduction Index (ARCI) score was created with 0 as minimal and 4 as high-risk using pCS-dCS ≥70 ms = 2 points; pCS ≥36 ms = 1 point; and CHADS2-VASc score ≥3 = 1 point. In the validation cohort, 0% of patients with ARCI score = 0 developed AF, whereas 89% of patients with ARCI score = 4 developed AF.

CONCLUSION:

We developed and validated a risk score using atrial conduction parameters and clinical risk factors to predict AF after tAFL ablation. It stratifies low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients and may be helpful in individualizing approaches to AF monitoring and anticoagulation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article