Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of lung ultrasonography by general practitioners for lower respiratory tract infections: a feasibility study.
Amiot, Félix; Delomas, Thomas; Laborne, François-Xavier; Ecolivet, Thomas; Macrez, Richard; Benhamed, Axel.
Afiliação
  • Amiot F; Emergency Department-SAMU50, Centre Hospitalier Mémorial Saint-Lô, Saint-Lô, France.
  • Delomas T; Emergency Department-SAMU50, Centre Hospitalier Mémorial Saint-Lô, Saint-Lô, France.
  • Laborne FX; SAMU91, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien, Corbeil-Essonnes, France.
  • Ecolivet T; Primary Care Centre, Troarn, France.
  • Macrez R; Normandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders," Institut Blood and Brain @ Caen-Normandie, Caen, France.
  • Benhamed A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 42(3): 463-470, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767949
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings.

DESIGN:

A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020). SETTINGS AND

SUBJECTS:

Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability.

RESULTS:

A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% (n = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively (p = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS.

CONCLUSIONS:

LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinicaltrial.gov NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Estudos de Viabilidade / Ultrassonografia / Clínicos Gerais / Pulmão Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Estudos de Viabilidade / Ultrassonografia / Clínicos Gerais / Pulmão Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article