Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A machine learning approach using stone volume to predict stone-free status at ureteroscopy.
Vigneswaran, Ganesh; Teh, Ren; Ripa, Francesco; Pietropaolo, Amelia; Modi, Sachin; Chauhan, Jagmohan; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Vigneswaran G; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Teh R; Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Ripa F; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Pietropaolo A; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK.
  • Modi S; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK.
  • Chauhan J; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Somani BK; Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 344, 2024 May 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775943
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To develop a predictive model incorporating stone volume along with other clinical and radiological factors to predict stone-free (SF) status at ureteroscopy (URS). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing URS for kidney stone disease at our institution from 2012 to 2021. SF status was defined as stone fragments < 2 mm at the end of the procedure confirmed endoscopically and no evidence of stone fragments > 2 mm at XR KUB or US KUB at 3 months follow up. We specifically included all non-SF patients to optimise our algorithm for identifying instances with residual stone burden. SF patients were also randomly sampled over the same time period to ensure a more balanced dataset for ML prediction. Stone volumes were measured using preprocedural CT and combined with 19 other clinical and radiological factors. A bagged trees machine learning model with cross-validation was used for this analysis.

RESULTS:

330 patients were included (SF n = 276, not SF n = 54, mean age 59.5 ± 16.1 years). A fivefold cross validated RUSboosted trees model has an accuracy of 74.5% and AUC of 0.82. The model sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 72.2% respectively. Variable importance analysis identified total stone volume (17.7% of total importance), operation time (14.3%), age (12.9%) and stone composition (10.9%) as important factors in predicting non-SF patients. Single and cumulative stone size which are commonly used in current practice to guide management, only represented 9.4% and 4.7% of total importance, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Machine learning can be used to predict patients that will be SF at the time of URS. Total stone volume appears to be more important than stone size in predicting SF status. Our findings could be used to optimise patient counselling and highlight an increasing role of stone volume to guide endourological practice and future guidelines.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Ureteroscopia / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Ureteroscopia / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article