Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review of bacterial resistance among inpatients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
Reffat, Noora; Schwei, Rebecca J; Griffin, Meggie; Pop-Vicas, Aurora; Schulz, Lucas T; Pulia, Michael S.
Afiliação
  • Reffat N; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Schwei RJ; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Griffin M; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Pop-Vicas A; Department of Medicine-Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Schulz LT; School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Pulia MS; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: mspulia@medicine.wis
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 38: 49-65, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789083
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention operations worldwide, raising concerns for an acceleration of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, we aimed to define the scope of peer reviewed research comparing AMR in inpatient bacterial clinical cultures before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

We conducted a scoping review and searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through 15 June 2023. Our inclusion criteria were (1) English language, (2) primary evidence, (3) peer-reviewed, (4) clinical culture data from humans, (5) AMR data for at least one bacterial order/species, (6) inpatient setting, (7) use of statistical testing to evaluate AMR data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reviewers extracted country, study design, type of analysis, study period, setting and population, number of positive cultures or isolates, culture type(s), method of AMR analysis, organisms, and AMR results. Study results were organised by organism and antibiotic class or resistance mechanism. AMR results are also summarised by individual study and across all studies.

RESULTS:

In total, 4805 articles were identified with 55 papers meeting inclusion criteria. Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly studied organisms. There were 464 bacterial AMR results across all studies with 82 (18%) increase, 71 (15%) decrease, and 311 (67%) no change results.

CONCLUSIONS:

The literature examining the impact of COVID-19 on AMR among inpatients is diverse with most results reflecting no change pre/post pandemic. Ongoing inquiry is needed into evolving patterns in AMR post COVID-19.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacorresistência Bacteriana / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Pacientes Internados / Antibacterianos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacorresistência Bacteriana / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Pacientes Internados / Antibacterianos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article