Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning Methods and Visual Observations to Categorize Behavior of Grazing Cattle Using Accelerometer Signals.
Parsons, Ira Lloyd; Karisch, Brandi B; Stone, Amanda E; Webb, Stephen L; Norman, Durham A; Street, Garrett M.
Afiliação
  • Parsons IL; Quantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
  • Karisch BB; West River Research and Extension Center, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD 57703, USA.
  • Stone AE; Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
  • Webb SL; Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
  • Norman DA; Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute and Department of Rangeland, Wildlife, and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
  • Street GM; Quantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(10)2024 May 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794023
ABSTRACT
Accelerometers worn by animals produce distinct behavioral signatures, which can be classified accurately using machine learning methods such as random forest decision trees. The objective of this study was to identify accelerometer signal separation among parsimonious behaviors. We achieved this objective by (1) describing functional differences in accelerometer signals among discrete behaviors, (2) identifying the optimal window size for signal pre-processing, and (3) demonstrating the number of observations required to achieve the desired level of model accuracy,. Crossbred steers (Bos taurus indicus; n = 10) were fitted with GPS collars containing a video camera and tri-axial accelerometers (read-rate = 40 Hz). Distinct behaviors from accelerometer signals, particularly for grazing, were apparent because of the head-down posture. Increasing the smoothing window size to 10 s improved classification accuracy (p < 0.05), but reducing the number of observations below 50% resulted in a decrease in accuracy for all behaviors (p < 0.05). In-pasture observation increased accuracy and precision (0.05 and 0.08 percent, respectively) compared with animal-borne collar video observations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Acelerometria / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Acelerometria / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article