Misclassification of Opisthorchis viverrini and Minute Intestinal Fluke Eggs by Routine Laboratory Staff Using Images from the Kato-Katz Method.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Kato-Katz method is a commonly used diagnostic tool for helminth infections, particularly in field studies. This method can yield inaccurate results when samples contain eggs that are similar in appearance, such as Minute Intestinal Fluke (MIF) and Opisthorchis viverrini (OV) eggs. The close resemblance of eggs can be problematic and raises the possibility of false diagnoses. The objectives were to compare the diagnostic performance of the Kato-Katz method for accurately identifying MIF and OV and to provide evidence of possible misclassification.  Methods: Based on questionnaire responses from 15 (young parasitologists and public health staff), the test comprised 50 MIF egg images and 50 OV egg images, for a total of 100 Google Form questionnaires. RESULTS: The morphology of MIF and OV eggs found size and shape similarity and found that the shoulder rims were small, while the OV egg found the knobs had disappeared. The opercular conjunction was apparent, the shoulder rims and miricidium were prominent. The average percentage of correctly classified infections was 61.6 ± 12.1%. The accuracy percentages for both public health staff and young parasitologists in identifying were found to be 59.0 ± 14.8 and 66.8 ± 2.8, respectively. There was no significant difference observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need for improving the accuracy of parasite identification. Preserving stool samples before the Kato-Katz method can help mitigate the potential degradation or distortion of parasite eggs. The incorrect classification of both eggs had an impact on treatment plans and the policy of parasite control programs.