Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Family communication of cancer genetic test results in an ethnically diverse population: a qualitative exploration of more than 200 patients.
Hodan, Rachel; Picus, Miles; Stanclift, Caroline; Ormond, Kelly E; Pichardo, Jennifer Morales; Kurian, Allison W; Ricker, Charité; Idos, Gregory E.
Afiliação
  • Hodan R; Cancer Genetics and Genomics, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA. rhodan@stanfordhealthcare.org.
  • Picus M; Department of Pediatrics (Genetics), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. rhodan@stanfordhealthcare.org.
  • Stanclift C; Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Ormond KE; Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Pichardo JM; Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Kurian AW; Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Ricker C; Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, (DHEST), ETH-Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Idos GE; Center for Precision Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
J Community Genet ; 15(4): 363-374, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814439
ABSTRACT
Previous research on family communication of cancer genetic test results has primarily focused on non-Hispanic White patients with high-risk pathogenic variants (PV). There are limited data on patient communication of moderate-risk PVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and negative results. This qualitative study examined communication of positive, negative, and VUS hereditary cancer multi-gene panel (MGP) results in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 patients who underwent MGP testing at three hospitals in California, USA, free-text written survey responses to the question "Feel free to share any thoughts or experiences with discussing genetic test results with others" were collected from participant questionnaires administered at 3 and 12-months post results disclosure. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a theory-driven analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), on 256 responses from 214 respondents. Respondents with high perceived utility of sharing genetic test results often reported positive attitudes towards sharing test results and direct encouragement for genetic testing of others. Respondents with high self-efficacy in the sharing process were likely to report high perceived utility of sharing, whereas patients with low self-efficacy more often had VUS results and were more likely to report uncertainty about sharing. Consistent with TPB, our findings suggest that clinician reinforcement of the utility of genetic testing may increase intent for patients to communicate genetic information. Our findings suggest that clinicians should focus on strategies to improve patient understanding of VUS results.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article