Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective Evaluation of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes following Video-Assisted Rhino-Septoplasty.
Radulesco, Thomas; Ebode, Dario; Medawar, Charbel; Penicaud, Martin; Michel, Justin.
Afiliação
  • Radulesco T; Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, IUSTI, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Marseille, France. Thomas.radulesco@ap-hm.fr.
  • Ebode D; Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, IUSTI, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Marseille, France.
  • Medawar C; Style Beauty Clinic, Sin el Fil, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Penicaud M; Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, 147 Bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
  • Michel J; Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, IUSTI, La Conception University Hospital, ENT-HNS, Department, Marseille, France.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 2024 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819447
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conservative techniques have been developed in the field of rhinoplasty, focusing on limited tissue resection while emphasizing the reshaping of nasal structural elements.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to prospectively evaluate aesthetic and functional outcomes following Video-Assisted Rhino-Septoplasty (VARS) using validated tools.

METHODS:

Patients' self-reported outcomes were assessed before and 6 months after surgery. Aesthetic evaluations used FACE-Q Rhinoplasty modules (FQRM) Satisfaction with Nose and Nostrils. Functional evaluations were performed with NOSE scores. T-tests were used to determine the significance of the change in scores before and after surgery. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

Fifty patients were included (sex ratio = 0.16, mean age = 30 y.o., 78% primary cases). All patients had associated septoplasties, and 32 had inferior turbinate reductions. Mean FQRM Nose scores were 28.1 ± 16.3 before vs. 83.4 ± 17.2/100 after surgery. Mean FQRM Nostrils scores were 61.5 ± 28.6 before vs. 85 ± 21/100 after surgery. Mean NOSE scores were 49.5 ± 36.3 before vs. 14.8 ± 16.6/100 after surgery. All p <0.001. We found no correlation between FQRM Nose and NOSE scores after surgery (ρ = -0.1553, IC95% (-0.41;0.12), p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed that VARS is an effective technique, yielding high patient satisfaction in both aesthetic and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article