Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Awareness of peripheral IV catheters among nurses, physicians, and trainees: A prospective cohort study.
Adzemovic, Tessa; Govindan, Sushant; Zheutlin, Alexander; Horowitz, Jennifer; Heath, Megan; Kuhn, Latoya; Nabeel, Muhammed; Kalra, Smita K; Dhillon, Dilshan; Kaatz, Scott; Swaminathan, Lakshmi; Harba, Nejla; Chopra, Vineet.
Afiliação
  • Adzemovic T; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Govindan S; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
  • Zheutlin A; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Horowitz J; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Heath M; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Kuhn L; Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Nabeel M; Department of Internal Medicine, Sparrow, East Lansing, MI.
  • Kalra SK; Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA.
  • Dhillon D; Division of Cardiology, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI.
  • Kaatz S; Division of Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.
  • Swaminathan L; St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Harba N; University of Michigan School of Literature Sciences and the Arts, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Chopra V; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: vineet.chopra@cuanschutz.edu.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVs) are the most frequently used invasive device in hospitalized patients. These devices are not benign and are associated with complications. However, clinician awareness of them is variable and poorly understood.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational point prevalence study to assess awareness of PIV presence among clinicians caring for hospitalized patients in 4 hospitals between May 2018 and February 2019 located in Michigan, USA. We first assessed patients for the presence of a PIV then interviewed their providers. Differences in awareness by provider type were assessed via χ² tests; P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed on Stata MP v16.

RESULTS:

A total of 1,385 patients and 4,003 providers were interviewed. Nurses had the greatest awareness of overall PIV presence, 98.6%, while attendings were correct 88.1% of the time. Nurses were more likely to correctly assess PIV presence and exact location than physicians (67.7% vs <30% for all others). Awareness of PIV presence did not significantly vary in patients on contact precautions or those receiving infusions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given the ubiquity of PIVs and known complications, methods to increase awareness to ensure appropriate care and removal are necessary.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article