Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of topical clobetasol propionate in comparison with alternative treatments in oral lichen planus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zheng, Tao; Liu, ChengYong; Wang, YeTong; Zhou, Rong; Wu, Dan; Tan, Jin; Zhu, KeKe.
Afiliação
  • Zheng T; School of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Liu C; School of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Wang Y; School of Stomatology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Zhou R; Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Wu D; Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Tan J; Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
  • Zhu K; Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1391754, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38854667
ABSTRACT

Background:

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a relatively common chronic T cell-mediated disease characterized by pain and inflammation. Clobetasol propionate (CLO) is the first-line drug in the treatment of OLP. The meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CLO for treating patients with OLP.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched from the database inception date up to August 2023. There were no restrictions on language or date of publication. The outcomes of our interest were as follows improvement of clinical signs and/or symptoms, total lesion size, relapse and adverse events.

Results:

A total of 17 RCTs evaluating the effects of CLO were included in this study. The results revealed no significant difference in the clinical score (WMD = 0.14, 95% CI -0.39, 0.66; p = 0.609) and pain score (WMD = 0.17, 95% CI -0.44, 0.79; p = 0.582) between CLO and other treatments. However, clinical resolution (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.17, 2.22; p = 0.003) and symptoms improvement (RR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.17, 2.77; p = 0.008) were significantly different between CLO and other treatments. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the total lesion size with CLO treatment (WMD = -0.58, 95% CI -1.03, -0.13; p = 0.011). In addition, CLO showed no statistical incidence of adverse events (RR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.86, 2.50; p = 0.161) and relapse (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.66, 3.71; p = 0.314) than other therapies.

Conclusion:

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials supported the long-term application of CLO as an effective regimen in OLP patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article