Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of post-stroke aphasia severity.
Teghipco, Alex; Newman-Norlund, Roger; Fridriksson, Julius; Rorden, Christopher; Bonilha, Leonardo.
Afiliação
  • Teghipco A; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. alex.teghipco@sc.edu.
  • Newman-Norlund R; Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Fridriksson J; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Rorden C; Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Bonilha L; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Commun Med (Lond) ; 4(1): 115, 2024 Jun 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866977
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Emerging evidence suggests that post-stroke aphasia severity depends on the integrity of the brain beyond the lesion. While measures of lesion anatomy and brain integrity combine synergistically to explain aphasic symptoms, substantial interindividual variability remains unaccounted. One explanatory factor may be the spatial distribution of morphometry beyond the lesion (e.g., atrophy), including not just specific brain areas, but distinct three-dimensional patterns.

METHODS:

Here, we test whether deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on whole brain morphometry (i.e., segmented tissue volumes) and lesion anatomy better predicts chronic stroke individuals with severe aphasia (N = 231) than classical machine learning (Support Vector Machines; SVMs), evaluating whether encoding spatial dependencies identifies uniquely predictive patterns.

RESULTS:

CNNs achieve higher balanced accuracy and F1 scores, even when SVMs are nonlinear or integrate linear or nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Parity only occurs when SVMs access features learned by CNNs. Saliency maps demonstrate that CNNs leverage distributed morphometry patterns, whereas SVMs focus on the area around the lesion. Ensemble clustering of CNN saliencies reveals distinct morphometry patterns unrelated to lesion size, consistent across individuals, and which implicate unique networks associated with different cognitive processes as measured by the wider neuroimaging literature. Individualized predictions depend on both ipsilateral and contralateral features outside the lesion.

CONCLUSIONS:

Three-dimensional network distributions of morphometry are directly associated with aphasia severity, underscoring the potential for CNNs to improve outcome prognostication from neuroimaging data, and highlighting the prospective benefits of interrogating spatial dependence at different scales in multivariate feature space.
Some stroke survivors experience difficulties understanding and producing language. We performed brain imaging to capture information about brain structure in stroke survivors and used it to predict which survivors have more severe language problems. We found that a type of artificial intelligence (AI) specifically designed to find patterns in spatial data was more accurate at this task than more traditional methods. AI found more complex patterns of brain structure that distinguish stroke survivors with severe language problems by analyzing the brain's spatial properties. Our findings demonstrate that AI tools can provide new information about brain structure and function following stroke. With further developments, these models may be able to help clinicians understand the extent to which language problems can be improved after a stroke.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article