Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In-home TB Testing Using GeneXpert Edge is Acceptable, Feasible, and Improves the Proportion of Symptomatic Household Contacts Tested for TB: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Medina-Marino, Andrew; Bezuidenhout, Dana; Bezuidenhout, Charl; Facente, Shelley N; Fourie, Bernard; Shin, Sanghyuk S; Penn-Nicholson, Adam; Theron, Grant.
Afiliação
  • Medina-Marino A; Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Bezuidenhout D; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Bezuidenhout C; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Facente SN; School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Fourie B; School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Shin SS; Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Penn-Nicholson A; Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Theron G; FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(6): ofae279, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868309
ABSTRACT

Background:

Household contact investigations are effective for finding tuberculosis (TB) cases but are hindered by low referral uptake for clinic-based evaluation and testing. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of in-home testing of household contacts (HHC) using the GeneXpert Edge platform.

Methods:

We conducted a 2-arm, randomized study in Eastern Cape, South Africa. HHCs were verbally assessed using the World Health Organization-recommended 4-symptom screen. Households with ≥1 eligible symptomatic contact were randomized. Intervention households received in-home GeneXpert MTB/RIF molecular testing. GeneXpert-positive HHCs were referred for clinic-based treatment. Standard-of-care households were referred for clinic-based sputum collection and testing. We defined acceptability as agreeing to in-home testing and feasibility as generation of valid Xpert MTB/RIF results. The proportion and timeliness of test results received was compared between groups.

Results:

Eighty-four households were randomized (n = 42 per arm). Of 100 eligible HHCs identified, 98/100 (98%) provided consent. Of 51 HHCs allocated to the intervention arm, all accepted in-home testing; of those, 24/51 (47%) were sputum productive and 23/24 (96%) received their test results. Of 47 HCCs allocated to standard-of-care, 7 (15%) presented for clinic-based TB evaluation, 6/47 (13%) were tested, and 4/6 (67%) returned for their results. The median (interquartile range) number of days from screening to receiving test results was 0 (0) and 16.5 (11-15) in the intervention and standard-of-care arms, respectively.

Conclusions:

In-home testing for TB was acceptable, feasible, and increased HHCs with a molecular test result. In-home testing mitigates a major limitation of household contact investigations (dependency on clinic-based referral), revealing new strategies for enhancing early case detection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article