Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Icelandic Prevention Model Evaluation Framework and Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment.
Mann, Michael J; Allegrante, John P; Smith, Megan L; Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora; Kristjansson, Alfgeir L.
Afiliação
  • Mann MJ; School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
  • Allegrante JP; Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027, USA; Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
  • Smith ML; School of Public and Population Health, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
  • Sigfusdottir ID; Department of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik 101, Iceland; Icelandic Centre for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik 101, Iceland.
  • Kristjansson AL; Icelandic Centre for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik 101, Iceland; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences and WV Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. Electronic address: alkristjansson@hsc.wvu.edu.
Eval Program Plann ; 106: 102451, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879919
ABSTRACT
The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a 1) five-phase IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF); and 2) 10-Step IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment (IPM-IICA) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1 Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3 Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4 Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5 Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias Limite: Adolescent / Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias Limite: Adolescent / Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article