Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) versus minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
da Silveira, Carlos Andre Balthazar; Dias Rasador, Ana Caroline; Lima, Diego Laurentino; Kasakewitch, João P G; Nogueira, Raquel; Sreeramoju, Prashanth; Malcher, Flavio.
Afiliação
  • da Silveira CAB; Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Dias Rasador AC; Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Lima DL; Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, NY, USA. dilaurentino@gmail.com.
  • Kasakewitch JPG; Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Nogueira R; Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Sreeramoju P; Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Malcher F; Division of General Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA.
Hernia ; 28(4): 1053-1061, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888838
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique is an open approach to groin hernia repair with posteriorly positioned mesh supposed to reduce recurrence rates. However, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques have similar mesh positioning with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TIPP and MIS for groin hernia repair. SOURCE Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies comparing TIPP and MIS techniques for groin hernia repair. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, chronic pain, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, and hematoma. We performed a subgroup analysis of TAPP and TEP techniques separately. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio. PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

81 studies were screened and 19 were thoroughly reviewed. Six studies were included, of which two compared TIPP with TEP technique, two compared TIPP with TAPP, and two compared TIPP with both TEP and TAPP techniques. We found lower recurrence rates for the TEP technique compared to TIPP (0.38% versus 1.19%; RR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01 to 7.11; P = 0.04). Also, we found lower seroma rates for TIPP group on the overall analysis (RR 0.21; P = 0.002). We did not find statistically significant differences regarding overall recurrence (RR 1.6; P = 0.19), chronic pain (RR 1.53; P = 0.2), SSI (RR 2.51; P = 0.47), and hematoma (RR 1.29; P = 0.76) between MIS and TIPP. No statistically significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis of TAPP technique for all the outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Our systematic review and meta-analysis found no differences between TIPP and MIS approaches in the overall analysis of recurrence, SSI, and chronic pain rates. Further research is needed to analyze individual techniques and draw a more precise conclusion on this subject. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID CRD42024530107, April 8, 2024.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Herniorrafia / Hérnia Inguinal Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telas Cirúrgicas / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Herniorrafia / Hérnia Inguinal Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article