Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterizing the Relationship between Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs), DNA Methylation Quantitative Trait Loci (mQTLs), and Breast Cancer Risk Variants.
Ho, Peh Joo; Khng, Alexis; Tan, Benita Kiat-Tee; Khor, Chiea Chuen; Tan, Ern Yu; Lim, Geok Hoon; Yuan, Jian-Min; Tan, Su-Ming; Chang, Xuling; Tan, Veronique Kiak Mien; Sim, Xueling; Dorajoo, Rajkumar; Koh, Woon-Puay; Hartman, Mikael; Li, Jingmei.
Afiliação
  • Ho PJ; Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
  • Khng A; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
  • Tan BK; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore.
  • Khor CC; Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
  • Tan EY; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
  • Lim GH; Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
  • Yuan JM; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore.
  • Tan SM; Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
  • Chang X; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
  • Tan VKM; Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.
  • Sim X; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
  • Dorajoo R; Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138673, Singapore.
  • Koh WP; KK Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore.
  • Hartman M; Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
  • Li J; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(11)2024 May 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38893190
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the association of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for functional genetic variants with the risk of developing breast cancer.

METHODS:

Summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) and heterogeneity in dependent instruments (HEIDI) were used to identify breast cancer risk variants associated with gene expression and DNA methylation levels. A new SMR-based PRS was computed from the identified variants (functional PRS) and compared to an established 313-variant breast cancer PRS (GWAS PRS). The two scores were evaluated in 3560 breast cancer cases and 3383 non-cancer controls and also in a prospective study (n = 10,213) comprising 418 cases.

RESULTS:

We identified 149 variants showing pleiotropic association with breast cancer risk (eQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 9, mQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 165). The discriminatory ability of the functional PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI] 0.540 [0.526 to 0.553]) was found to be lower than that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI] 0.609 [0.596 to 0.622]). Even when utilizing 457 distinct variants from both the functional and GWAS PRS, the combined discriminatory performance remained below that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous, combined [95% CI] 0.561 [0.548 to 0.575]). A binary high/low-risk classification based on the 80th centile PRS in controls revealed a 6% increase in cases using the GWAS PRS compared to the functional PRS. The functional PRS identified an additional 12% of high-risk cases but also led to a 13% increase in high-risk classification among controls. Similar findings were observed in the SCHS prospective cohort, where the GWAS PRS outperformed the functional PRS, and the highest-performing PRS, a combined model, did not significantly improve over the GWAS PRS.

CONCLUSIONS:

While this study identified potentially functional variants associated with breast cancer risk, their inclusion did not substantially enhance the predictive accuracy of the GWAS PRS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article