Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comprehensive Evaluation of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic Dental Implant Materials: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties.
Peter, Claudia; Shah, Krupali; Simon, Lovebin; Pm, Shyama; N, Ashwathi; El-Shamy, Fahiem Mohammad.
Afiliação
  • Peter C; Department of Prosthodontics, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Tirunelveli, IND.
  • Shah K; Department of Periodontology and Implantology, KM Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, IND.
  • Simon L; Department of Prosthodontics, Century Dental College, Thekkil, IND.
  • Pm S; Department of Prosthodontics, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Dental College, Kozhikode, IND.
  • N A; Department of Orthodontics, Kannur Dental College, Anjarakandy, IND.
  • El-Shamy FM; Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EGY.
Cureus ; 16(5): e60582, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38894756
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Dental implant materials play a pivotal role in the success of restorative dentistry. This study comprehensively compares the mechanical and esthetic properties of three commonly used dental implant materials titanium, zirconia, and ceramic.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to provide insights into the suitability of titanium, zirconia, and ceramic for various clinical applications within implant dentistry.

METHODS:

Ninety dental implants, 30 for each material, were selected based on their well-established usage in dental implantology. Mechanical properties, including tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and fatigue resistance, were assessed using state-of-the-art testing machines. Esthetic properties, such as color stability and translucency, were scrutinized through immersion in staining solutions and spectrophotometer measurements. Fracture properties and biocompatibility were also evaluated.

RESULTS:

Mechanical testing revealed that titanium exhibited the highest tensile strength (810 ± 55 MPa), while zirconia demonstrated the highest modulus of elasticity (208 ± 8 GPa). Titanium also displayed the greatest fatigue resistance (1,010,000 ± 95,000 cycles), whereas zirconia had the highest hardness (1190 ± 45 Vickers hardness number (VHN)). Esthetically, zirconia showed superior color stability (ΔE 1.7 ± 0.2), while ceramic exhibited the highest translucency (TP% 15.3 ± 1.7). Zirconia presented the lowest surface roughness (0.28 ± 0.04 µm).

CONCLUSION:

This study provides insights into potential dental implant material performance, with zirconia emerging as a promising alternative. Future research should validate these findings in clinical settings, considering a broader array of variables and long-term outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article