Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selecting the right treatment: Health outcome priorities in older patients with bladder cancer.
Rutten, Vera C; Al, Cornelia M; Festen, Suzanne; Zuiverloon, Tahlita C M; Boormans, Joost L; Polinder-Bos, Harmke A.
Afiliação
  • Rutten VC; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: v.rutten@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Al CM; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Festen S; University of Groningen, University Center for Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Zuiverloon TCM; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Boormans JL; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Polinder-Bos HA; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 15(6): 101811, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896950
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Selecting the appropriate treatment for older patients with non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is challenging due to smoking-related comorbidities, treatment toxicity, and an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. Considering patient preferences prior to treatment is therefore crucial. Here, we aimed to identify the health outcome priorities of older patients with high-risk NMIBC (HR-NMIBC) or MIBC. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients aged 70 years or older or at risk for frailty, diagnosed with HR-NMIBC or MIBC without distant metastases, were referred for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The CGA consisted of an interview, physical examination, and several tests to examine physical, cognitive, functional, and social status. Quality of life was assessed using EQ5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Health outcome priorities were discussed using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and associations between health outcome priorities and CGA-determinants and quality of life were studied.

RESULTS:

Of 146 patients (14 HR-NMIBC, 132 MIBC), OPT data was available for 139. Life extension was most often prioritized (44%), closely followed by preserving independence (40%). Reducing pain (7%) and other symptoms (9%) were less often prioritized. Patients prioritizing life extension had fewer musculoskeletal problems than patients prioritizing reducing pain or other symptoms (p = 0.02). Patients at risk of or suffering from malnutrition more frequently selected reducing pain or other symptoms as their health outcome priority (p = 0.004). For all other CGA-determinants and quality of life, there were no significant differences between groups based on health outcome priorities.

DISCUSSION:

In older patients with HR-NMIBC and MIBC, life extension and preserving independence are the most common health outcomes priorities. CGA-determinants and quality of life are generally not associated with the prioritization of health outcomes. As health outcome priorities cannot be predicted by CGA-determinants or quality of life, it is crucial to discuss health outcome priorities with patients to promote shared decision-making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Avaliação Geriátrica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Avaliação Geriátrica Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article