Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The quality of guidelines on the pancreatic perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic quality appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
Zhang, Ying; Li, Zhi-Hua; Li, Si-Wen; Liu, Zi-Han.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Y; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Li ZH; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China. hongyu30@126.com.
  • Li SW; Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Liu ZH; Institute for Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(7): 456, 2024 Jun 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916656
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the quality of guidelines on the pancreatic perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery both domestically and internationally, providing reference and reference for clinical practice.

METHODS:

Systemically retrieved in the guideline websites, professional association websites and databases, such as up to date, BMJ Best Practice, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), Medlive, Guidelines International Network(GIN), National Guideline Clearinghouse(NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE), Registered Nurses Association of Ontario(RNAO), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network(SIGN), Joanna Briggs Institute Library(JBI), including guidelines and expert consensus on enhanced postsurgical recovery in pancreatic surgery published as of December 20, 2023. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II(AGREE II) tool was applied to evaluate the quality of the guidelines by four assessors.

RESULTS:

This study included seven guidelines, all of which were rated as Grade B in terms of quality, with ICC coefficients ranging from 0.752 to 0.884, indicating a high level of consistency.

CONCLUSION:

When formulating guidelines in the future, it is recommended to use AGREE II as a reference, emphasizing the standardization of the guideline development process and methods, fully considering patients' values and preferences, focusing on the applicability of the guidelines, and striving to create high-quality evidence-based recommendations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article