Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.
Fava, Maurizio; Stahl, Stephen M; Pani, Luca; De Martin, Sara; Cutler, Andrew J; Maletic, Vladimir; Gorodetzky, Charles W; Vocci, Frank J; Sapienza, Frank L; Kosten, Thomas R; Kröger, Cornelia; Champasa, Paggard; O'Gorman, Cedric; Guidetti, Clotilde; Alimonti, Andrea; Comai, Stefano; Mattarei, Andrea; Folli, Franco; Bushnell, David; Traversa, Sergio; Inturrisi, Charles E; Manfredi, Paolo L; Pappagallo, Marco.
Afiliação
  • Fava M; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Stahl SM; Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California.
  • Pani L; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • De Martin S; Relmada Therapeutics, Inc, Coral Gables, Florida.
  • Cutler AJ; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Maletic V; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Gorodetzky CW; Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Vocci FJ; Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Sapienza FL; Neuroscience Education Institute, Carlsbad, California.
  • Kosten TR; Department of Psychiatry/Behavioral Science, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, South Carolina.
  • Kröger C; Consultant in Pharmaceutical Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Champasa P; Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • O'Gorman C; The Drug and Chemical Advisory Group LLC, Fairfax, Virginia.
  • Guidetti C; Baylor College of Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
  • Alimonti A; Relmada Therapeutics, Inc, Coral Gables, Florida.
  • Comai S; Relmada Therapeutics, Inc, Coral Gables, Florida.
  • Mattarei A; Relmada Therapeutics, Inc, Coral Gables, Florida.
  • Folli F; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Bushnell D; Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Traversa S; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Inturrisi CE; Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Manfredi PL; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Pappagallo M; Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 85(3)2024 Jun 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38917366
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants.

Methods:

In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD (DSM-5) were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35).

Results:

For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant (P = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% (P = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% (P = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 (P = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; P = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; P = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions:

The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04688164.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Antidepressivos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Antidepressivos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article