Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adjuvant imatinib in high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Merely delaying the inevitable?
Sutton, Thomas L; Billingsley, Kevin G; Johnson, Alicia J; Corless, Christopher L; Blanke, Charles D; Heinrich, Michael C; Mayo, Skye C.
Afiliação
  • Sutton TL; OHSU Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Billingsley KG; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Johnson AJ; OHSU Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Corless CL; OHSU Department of Pathology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Blanke CD; OHSU Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Heinrich MC; OHSU Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Mayo SC; OHSU Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 130(1): 40-46, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924626
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS:

We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed.

RESULTS:

We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal / Mesilato de Imatinib / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Antineoplásicos Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal / Mesilato de Imatinib / Neoplasias Gastrointestinais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Antineoplásicos Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article