Impact of Teprotumumab on Clinical Practice in Thyroid Eye Disease.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following its Food and Drug Administration approval in January 2020, we examined the impact of teprotumumab on thyroid eye disease (TED) clinical practices. METHODS: Across 3 referral centers from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2022, we retrospectively analyzed demographics, clinical features, treatment choices, and insurance status of patients with active, moderate to severe TED. RESULTS: Of 74 patients recommended for medical therapy, 53% received collaborative recommendations from endocrinologists and ophthalmologists in a TED clinic. Prior to teprotumumab availability, 19 patients were recommended medical therapy, and all received medical therapy (100%), which consists of corticosteroids (14, 73.7%) or tocilizumab (5, 26.3%). After teprotumumab became available, out of 55 patients that were recommended medical therapy, only 41 (74.6%) received medical therapy, mostly teprotumumab (33, 60%), followed by corticosteroids (5, 9.1%) or tocilizumab (3, 5.4%), while 14 (25.4%) did not receive medical therapy. Discordance between physicians' recommendations and therapy received or lack thereof was explained by patients' refusal (9, 64.3%), mostly due to side effect concerns (8, 88.9%), and insurance denial (5, 35.7%). Teprotumumab use was mostly associated with otic changes (10, 30.3%), weight loss (9, 27.3%), and hyperglycemia (6, 18.2%), but 2 (6.1%) patients developed serious infections. Corticosteroids were associated with insomnia (4, 21.1%), and 1 patient in the tocilizumab group had an infusion reaction requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Teprotumumab introduction increased TED therapy evaluations, yet not all received recommended treatment due to safety concerns or accessibility issues. Enhancing collaborative care, medication accessibility, and adverse effect management is crucial.