Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?
Pardey, Angela J; Phipps, Hala; Eames, Amanda; Hyett, Jon; Kuah, Sabrina; De Vries, Bradley.
Afiliação
  • Pardey AJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AUS.
  • Phipps H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, AUS.
  • Eames A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tweed Valley Hospital, Northern New South Wales (NSW) Local Health District, Cudgen, AUS.
  • Hyett J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, AUS.
  • Kuah S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, AUS.
  • De Vries B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, AUS.
Cureus ; 16(5): e61358, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947718
ABSTRACT
Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock-face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decision-making regarding fetal position during labor.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article